The University of Missouri-Columbia researchers have discussed the tendency to judge others based on their appearance and childhood experiences, highlighting the “asymmetrically sensitive” nature of this phenomenon. Despite the cautionary proverb about glass houses, people still form opinions about others, often letting their childhood hardships shape their perceptions.
Adverse childhood experiences negatively impact behavior
Associate professor of Philosophy Philip Robbins highlighted the impact of adverse childhood experiences on behavior. Negative actions are seen as influenced by upbringing rather than inherent morality, garnering less blame. Conversely, positive actions in the face of childhood adversity are viewed as more genuine reflections of one’s character, earning greater praise.
The study, which analysed survey data from 248 participants, suggests that facing challenges in childhood can lead to a transformative impact on an individual’s moral growth.
According to Prof Robbins adverse experiences can lead individuals to behave in ways that deviate from their true selves, pushing them towards anti-social behavior.
In this research, conducted by Robbins and Fernando Alvear from MU, they build upon previous work led by Prof. Robbins and colleagues, including Paul Litton. The earlier research revealed that individuals perceive violent criminals as less accountable and unworthy of punishment if informed about their childhood trauma. Similarly, people offer more admiration for adult good deeds if aware of their past adversity or suffering, such as abuse or neglect.
Study investigated reason behind formation of perceptions
The recent study by Robbins and Alvear aims to explore an unaddressed question from previous research: the reason behind the significant impact of this information on people’s perceptions of others.
The array of consequences on individuals’ social engagements holds significant implications, as elucidated by Professor Robbins. The role of moral assessment holds immense significance in our interpersonal connections, as it constitutes a fundamental component of our social evaluative processes. The ongoing study forms a component of a broader initiative focused on comprehending the mechanisms underlying moral judgment thus potentially reshaping cognitive frameworks and fostering favorable impacts on customary patterns of assigning responsibility and commendation.
